USPTO serial 77652279
AHP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AHP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
March-Hugstetten, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine parts, namely, hydraulic cylinders, hydraulic norm cylinders, hydraulic standard cylinders, hydraulic cylinders with proximity switches, hydraulic cylinders with distance measurement mechanism to determine the position of the piston in the cylinder, block cylinders, circular block cylinders, flange cylinders, short-stroke cylinders, cube cylinders, screw-in cylinders, double-pipe cylinders and hydraulic cylinders with external guides the cylinders move in; hydraulic pushing units; swing tension cylinders; rotary drives used for actuating flaps or valves when machine platforms are turned; core puller units to pull cores out of casting molds; and fluid pressure boosters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |