Drawing for HOME PRODUCER

USPTO serial 77652519

HOME PRODUCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME PRODUCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas A. Miro

Douglas A. Miro Ostrolenk Faber LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas7th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an incentive award program to promote the participation in the financing of creative projectsACTIVE—
036Financial services, namely, services rendered in facilitating and arranging the financing of an entertainment projectACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of motion picture films and music, distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of medial transmissionACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services and research and design relating to funding and evaluating revenue potential of an entertainment project; design and development of interactive computer software and dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 18, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 2, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 6, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 3, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 12, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2009CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance