CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CASABLANCA

USPTO serial 77653793

CASABLANCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4033058Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 4, 2011
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CASABLANCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Helen Hill Minsker

HELEN HILL MINSKER BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029(Based on 44(e)) Prepared Indian food entrees consisting primarily of beans or peas; prepared Indian Food entrees consisting primarily of vegetables, namely, pao bhaji, palak paneer, and chana masala; prepared Indian food appetizers, namely, potato sticks; prepared main course Indian foods consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, namely, matar, makhani, paneer, palak, bhaji, cholle, rajima, pakoda, dal, masalaSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
030(Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Indian foods, namely, baked goods in the nature of bread, namely, chapattis; condiments used with Indian foods, namely, condiments containing pickled mango, garlic, and lemon; ginger puree; garlic puree; garlic-ginger puree; chutney; Indian food sweets, namely, gulab jamun and rossogolla; prepared main course Indian foods consisting primarily of pasta or rice, namely, matar, makhani, paneer, palak, bhaji, cholle, rajima, pakoda, dal, masala; Indian food bread containing paneerSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2018C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Oct 4, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 13, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 13, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 3, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance