USPTO serial 77654078
FUCT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUCT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valley Village, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-Shirts; Long-Sleeve Shirts; Undershirts; Polo Shirts; Shirts; Tank Tops; Jackets; Leather Jackets; Bomber Jackets; Motorcycle Jackets; Gloves; Sweat Shirts with Hoods; Pants; Sweat Pants; Vests; Visors; Wristbands; Wetsuits; Sweat Shirts; Sweat Shorts; Hats; Caps; Beanies; Bandanas; Footwear; Beach Footwear; Work Boots; Flip Flops; Sweaters; Socks; Leather Belts; Shorts; Board shorts; Swim Trunks; Surf Wear; Boxer Briefs; Briefs; Athletic Uniforms; Athletic Footwear; Cargo Pants; Denim Jackets; Denims; Gym Shorts; Headbands; Martial Arts Uniforms; Track Suits; Training Suits; Sports Pants; Sports Bras; Dresses; Bikinis; Bathing Suits; Halter Tops; Yoga Pants; Women's Underwear; Pajamas; Photographer and Celebrity Collection T-Shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 24, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 24, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |