Drawing for TACKLE FOOTBALL

USPTO serial 77654515

TACKLE FOOTBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TACKLE FOOTBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas L. Lockhart

Thomas L. Lockhart Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett LLP333 Bridge Street, P.O. Box 352Grand Rapids, MI 49501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing other than clothing worn during football competitions, namely, athletic uniforms, baseball caps, bathing trunks, caps, coats, jackets, fleece pullovers, golf shirts, gym shorts, headwear, jerseys, jogging suits, polo shirts, shorts, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat suits, sweaters, tank tops, T-shirts, shirts, and pantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 6, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 6, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance