USPTO serial 77654989
GVI SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GVI SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Schultz
GEORGE R. SCHULTZ SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.5400 LBJ FWY STE 1200DALLAS, TX 75240-1067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Closed circuit television security equipment and systems comprised of motion sensors, television monitors, cameras and electronic positioning equipment therefor, video recorders, matrix switching equipment, wireless video transmitters and receivers, and armored and weatherproof video camera containers, all sold separately or together as a unit; video and audio capture units, electronic messaging interfaces, computer keypads, display monitors and controllers therefor, all sold separately or together as a unit; electronic signal transceivers for pan/tilt/zoom positioning devices; television monitors, plasma and LCD TVs; internet data transmitters; computer memory hardware and associated data compression software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |