USPTO serial 77655592
BARDELUXE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BARDELUXE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V. DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-1633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bathing suits; Bathrobes; Belts; Blazers; Blouses; Bow ties; Coats; Coats of denim; Denim jackets; Denims; Dress shirts; Dress suits; Footwear; Gloves; Headwear; Hosiery; Jackets; Jeans; Jerseys; Jogging suits; Nightwear; Overcoats; Pants; Pullovers; Pyjamas; Rainwear; Scarves; Shirts; Shorts; Ski wear; Slacks; Sliding shorts; Snowboard pants; Socks; Sports jerseys; Suits; T-shirts; Ties; Trousers; Underwear; Uniforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |