Drawing for PUROCLEAN: THE REAL RECESSION PROOF FRANCHISE

USPTO serial 77657777

PUROCLEAN: THE REAL RECESSION PROOF FRANCHISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PUROCLEAN: THE REAL RECESSION PROOF FRANCHISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

ANN K. FORD DLA PIPER LLP (US)500 8TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Franchise services, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of property damage restoration services, disaster recovery services in the nature of building cleanup and repair and commercial and residential building cleaning servicesACTIVEMar 27, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 19, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2009GSPSNOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2009GSPRSU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2009SPRASU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN
Nov 24, 2009CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Nov 23, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Nov 7, 2009SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 7, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 5, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 5, 2009EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 5, 2009EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 25, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 18, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 31, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance