Drawing for THECROWD

USPTO serial 77657943

THECROWD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IMAM, AMEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THECROWD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James F Landrum Jr

JAMES F LANDRUM JR SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP25 METRO DR FL 6SAN JOSE, CA 95110-1316UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing a website that displays various requests, reviews, recommendations, rankings, trackings, votes, and information in real time relating to products, services, and events in the fields of pop culture, entertainment, education, lifestyle, and sports, all exclusively for non-business and non-commercial transactions and purposesACTIVE—
042Hosting on-line web facilities for others that enables users to publish products, content and ideas for purposes of facilitating and conducting online connections, collaborations, and interactive discussions with other users about those products, content and ideas, and the collection of and access to data related thereto in real time; creating an on-line community for registered and unregistered users in the nature of a website application that enables users to publish products, content and ideas for purposes of facilitating and conducting online connections, collaborations, and interactive discussions with other users in real time about those products, content and ideas, and the collection of and access to data related theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 7, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 17, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 29, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance