USPTO serial 77658610
SUSO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUSO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Booth
MATTHEW J. BOOTH MATTHEW J. BOOTH & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 52050MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-5050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear and headgear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | games, toys and playthings; gymnastic and sporting articles | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 032 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | Providing access to information, audio, and video via websites, online forums, chat rooms, list servers and blogs over the Internet; hosting of online forums, chat rooms, list servers and blogs on the Internet; providing access to computer databases; electronic transmission of instant messages and data; providing access to on-line computer databases and on-line searchable databases in the fields of virtual communities, social networking, photo sharing, video sharing, and transmission of photographic images; broadcasting services via the Internet or other communication networks; webcasting services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services; education services; compilation, production, presentation, distribution, syndication and rental of radio programs, sound recordings, video recordings, television programs and films; recording services; provision of recording facilities; rental of recording apparatus; entertainment and education services for charitable fund-raising, fund raising events and sponsored events; entertainment and education services; organization of workshops, conferences and seminars; publishing services; provision of online publications; information, advice and assistance all relating to the aforesaid services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUSO Drinks Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SUSO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |