USPTO serial 77658687
OPTASENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2011
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with OPTASENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FARNBOROUGH HAMPSHIRE, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric R. Moran
Eric R. Moran McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP300 South Wacker Drive31st FloorChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fibre optic sensor system consisting primarily of fiber optic cables and fiber optic light and image conduits, lasers, acoustic sensors and data processors for use in monitoring and assessing the safety, stability and integrity of oil, gas and water pipelines, telecommunication networks, electrical cables, rail tracks and rail networks; fibre optic sensors system consisting primarily of fiber optic cables and fiber optic light and image conduits, lasers, acoustic sensors and data processors for use in border and perimeter security and detection of intruders and incursions; acoustic sensing apparatus in the nature of meters; fibre optic cables, fibre optic receptors, cabling networks consisting primarily of fibre optic cables; fibre optic communications peripheral apparatus for use with computers; electronic and acoustic sensors incorporating optical fibres; acoustic and electronic signal transmitting apparatus utilising optical fibres; hydrophones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OPTASENSE HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by QinetiQ Limited
- Other trademarks owned by QinetiQ Limited
- Other trademarks owned by QinetiQ Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OPTASENSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 17, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |