USPTO serial 77660142
DIGITAL STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
MICHELE P. SCHWARTZ ANDREWS KURTH LLP1717 MAIN ST STE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for authoring, disseminating, receiving, playing, storing, organizing, editing, copying, sharing, encoding, and decoding audio, video and multimedia contents; computer software for creating, viewing, manipulating, editing, managing, indexing, cataloguing, sorting, organizing, storing, transferring, synchronizing, printing, and exchanging digital photographs, digital and graphic images, audio, video and multimedia; computer software for transferring and sharing digital photographs, digital and graphic images and audio, video, multimedia to portable media players, compact discs and digital video discs; computer software for duplicating media discs, burning or backup digital photographs, audio, video, multimedia contents, documents, and data to compact discs and digital video discs, file management software for opening and converting photographic, digital, and graphic images, audio, video, and multimedia works to various file formats; computer graphic burning and copying software; computer software programs for creative graphic DVD menu design application; in International Class 009 | ACTIVE | Sep 9, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |