Drawing for ROLLING STONE HOTEL

USPTO serial 77660503

ROLLING STONE HOTEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLLING STONE HOTEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colleen M. Keegan

COLLEEN M KEEGAN DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1633 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019-6708UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotels; hotel bar and restaurant services; providing convention facilities; providing conference facilities; cocktail lounges; snack bars; arena services, namely, providing facilities for sports, the performing arts, conventions and exhibitions, all of the foregoing relating to Rolling Stone publication(s)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2013CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Apr 25, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 25, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 25, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 4, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance