Drawing for SMART MATCH SYSTEM

USPTO serial 77663246

SMART MATCH SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3746077Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 9, 2010
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART MATCH SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie A. Greenberg

RESOURCE TECHNOLOGIES CORP431 STEPHENSON HIGHWAYTROY, MI 48083-1130UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035personnel placement and recruitmentSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2015C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 29, 2015CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 23, 2015CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Feb 18, 2015PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 9, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 24, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance