Drawing for ALARMWATCH

USPTO serial 77664222

ALARMWATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ALARMWATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan D. Baker

SUSAN D. BAKER NILES, BARTON & WILMER, LLP111 S CALVERT ST STE 1400BALTIMORE, MD 21202-6185UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Monitoring burglar and security alarmsABANDONEDJan 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 19, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jul 19, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jul 19, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Oct 9, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Aug 21, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 11, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 2, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 23, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance