Drawing for THEORY

USPTO serial 77664363

THEORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DUBOIS, MICHELLE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THEORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bret J. Danow

Bret J. Danow Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP575 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN CARE PRODUCTS FOR THE FACE, BODY, HANDS AND FEET, NAMELY, CLEANSING LOTION, CLEANSING BARS, CLEANSING CREAM, OIL-FREE CLEANSING LOTION, OIL-FREE CLEANSING BARS, OIL-FREE CLEANSING CREAM, CLEANSING MILK, ASTRINGENTS, TONER, TONING LOTIONS, FACIAL MASQUES, MAKE-UP REMOVAL CREAM, MAKEUP REMOVAL OIL, NIGHT CREAM, OIL-FREE MOISTURIZER, WATER-BASED MOISTURIZERS, FOUNDATION MOISTURIZERS, ANTI-AGING CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, ANTI-WRINKLE SERUM, ANTI-WRINKLE OIL, SUNBLOCK MOISTURIZER, SUNBLOCK CREAM, AFTER-SUN LOTION, SUNTANNING PREPARATIONS, SUNLESS TANNING LOTION AND SUNLESS TANNING SPRAY, SUNBURN CREAM, EXFOLIANTS FOR SKIN, FACIAL MASKS, BODY POWDERS AND SPRAYS, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, DEODORANTS AND TOILET WATERS, BODY SPLASHES AND MOISTURIZING BODY MISTS, AFTER SHAVE LOTIONS, NAIL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NAIL ENAMEL, NAIL ENAMEL REMOVER, CUTICLE REMOVER, NAIL BASE COAT, NAIL DRYING PREPARATIONS, NAIL TOP COAT, NAIL SAVING PREPARATIONSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 29, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 30, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 28, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 30, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 13, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 13, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 24, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 12, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 22, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 21, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance