USPTO serial 77665348
ECO PRODUCTS ESTABLISHED 1990
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECO PRODUCTS ESTABLISHED 1990?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
DANIEL M. CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP1333 2ND ST STE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-4100UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Cutlery, namely, plastic forks, knives, and spoons; Plastic and paper dinner plates, dinner bowls, household containers for foods, insulated drinking cups and lids, beverage stirrers, insulated sleeves for beverage containers, meal trays, coffee mugs, coffee filters not of paper being part of non-electric coffee makers; Retail and wholesale store services, mail order, and wholesale distributorship services featuring paper towels, tissue, paper plates, napkins, bag liners, plastic lumber, dish liquid, hand soap, auto dish detergent, laundry detergent, fabric softener | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |