Drawing for FRIGO BEER

USPTO serial 77665994

FRIGO BEER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - SENIOR ATTORNEY

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRIGO BEER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Woldow

Scott D. Woldow SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1055 Thomas Jefferson St., NWSuite 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus and machines for refrigerating, namely, refrigerating cabinets, refrigerating display cabinets, refrigerating machines and components thereofACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 26, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 6, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 31, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 31, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 15, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Aug 5, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 4, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jun 7, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 11, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
May 11, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Apr 20, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 20, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 20, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Apr 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance