CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ! BRAIN FUEL MAXIMIZE LEARNING POTENTIAL

USPTO serial 77667004

! BRAIN FUEL MAXIMIZE LEARNING POTENTIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ! BRAIN FUEL MAXIMIZE LEARNING POTENTIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed materials, namely, informational materials in the form of pamphlets and brochures, in the field of nutrition and exercise to help improve individual learning potential that direct people to related Internet websites, all sold as a unit with lunch boxes and thermal insulated containers for food and beveragesACTIVE—
021Thermal insulated containers for food and beverages; thermal insulated lunch boxesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 28, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance