Drawing for LAB ARMOR

USPTO serial 77667173

LAB ARMOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LAB ARMOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM H. QUIRK

WILLIAM H. QUIRK TUGGEY ROSENTHAL PAUERSTEIN SANDOLOSKI AGATHER LLP755 E MULBERRY AVE STE 200SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212-4285UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Distribution services, namely, delivery of laboratory equipment and suppliesACTIVEJul 1, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Mar 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 24, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 24, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 19, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Feb 19, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 25, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 30, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 30, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 30, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 13, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance