USPTO serial 77668212
INNOLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3991488Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2011
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INNOLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
59071 Hamm-Uentrop, DE
59071 Hamm-Uentrop, DE
59071 Hamm-Uentrop, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia M. Mathers
PATRICIA M. MATHERS BOHAN MATHERS, LLCP.O. BOX 449PORTLAND, ME 04112-0449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Mineral substances in the nature of filtering materials for use in water purification installations, in particular for use in seepage channels and water collection basins; chemical preparations in the nature of filtering materials for use in water collection, treatment, and purification installations; mineral substances in the nature of filtering materials for use in water collection, treatment, and purification installations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Metal building materials for use in the construction of water drainage, collection, and treatment installations in residential, commercial and industrial construction, namely, channels in the nature of metal gutter pipes, pipes, pipework, shaft tubes, tube ferrules, pipe junctions, pipe connectors, pipe collars, pipe couplings, pipe joints and pipe fittings; metal containers for collecting, storing and treating seepage, waste water and rain water; metal inserts in the nature of metal bolts, metal screws, metal plugs, metal spacers, metal pins, metal clamps, metal supports in the nature of construction elements, and metal frames all for holding filters and screens, particularly for use in water drains, channels, and sewers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Water filters; water filters for use in residential, commercial, and industrial water filtration installations; plastic and metal screens for filtering water, particularly for use in water channels and drains | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metal building materials of plastic, concrete and polymer concrete for use in the construction of water drainage, collection, and treatment installations in residential, commercial and industrial construction, namely, channels in the nature of non-metal gutters, water pipes, pipework, shaft tubes, and tube ferrules; non-metal containers of concrete and polymer concrete, namely, trench drains, storm manholes, and liquid storage tanks of masonry for collecting, storing and treating seepage, waste water and rain water | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Funke Kunststoffe GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Funke Kunststoffe GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Funke Kunststoffe GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named INNOLET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |