Drawing for ENHANCING THE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL EXPERIENCE

USPTO serial 77668332

ENHANCING THE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL EXPERIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENHANCING THE LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL EXPERIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Eric Mills

E. ERIC MILLS WARD AND SMITH, P.A.PO BOX 867NEW BERN, NC 28563-0867UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical devices, namely, surgical devices for use in laparoscopic proceduresACTIVE
035retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of surgical devices for use in laparoscopic proceduresACTIVE
044medical consulting, namely, consulting with regard to surgical devices for use in laparoscopic proceduresACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 4, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 30, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
Mar 30, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 30, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance