Drawing for ECHOSTAR

USPTO serial 77669217

ECHOSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILKE, JOHN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECHOSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max S. Gratton

Max S. Gratton EchoStar Corp.100 Inverness Terrace EastLegal DepartmentENGLEWOOD, CO 80112

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009universal remote controls for home electronic devices, namely, televisions, VCRs, DVD players, stereo receivers, and stereo amplifiers;cable television receivers;software to enable uploading, posting, showing, modifying, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media and information over the Internet or other communication networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 22, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 11, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 6, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 10, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2009COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 19, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 10, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 24, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance