CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EARTHLINER

USPTO serial 77669291

EARTHLINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILLER, DAVID S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTHLINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matt Sumrow

Matthew A. Sumrow4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550Newport Beach, CA 92660UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Packaging materials made from mineral-based paper substitutesACTIVE—
017Packaging materials made from stone-based plastic substitutesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 13, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 30, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 26, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 1, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 20, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance