USPTO serial 77669767
DIYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4214260Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2012
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Compotes; dried lentils; edible oils and fats; eggs; fish; frozen appetizers consisting primarily of chicken or seafood; jellies, jams; meat; meat extracts; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; poultry and game; pre-packaged dinners consisting of meat, poultry, and/or vegetables; preserved, dried and cooked fruit and vegetables; processed vegetables and fruits; spicy pickles; vegetables, instant frozen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2010 |
| 030 | Biscuits and bread; bread; cereal based snack food; chutneys; cocoa; coffee; corn flour; flour; frozen breads; fruit ices; honey and treacle; pastry; pita bread; preparations made from cereals, namely, processed cereals; puffed rice; rice; rice flour; rice-based snack foods; sago; salt; sauces; seasoning pastes; spice blends; spices; sugar; tapioca; tea; vinegar | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kundan Distribution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kundan Distribution, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kundan Distribution, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DIYA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 17, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 17, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |