Drawing for CARDIOPATH ACC GUIDELINES APPLIED TO PRACTICE

USPTO serial 77669937

CARDIOPATH ACC GUIDELINES APPLIED TO PRACTICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDIOPATH ACC GUIDELINES APPLIED TO PRACTICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa A. Dunner

LISA A. DUNNER DUNNER LAW PLLC3243 P ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-2756UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic downloadable publications in the nature of clinical decision support flow charts for the purpose of providing patient treatment recommendations in the fields of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine and healthACTIVE
016Printed clinical decision support flow charts for the purpose of providing patient treatment recommendations in the fields of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine and healthACTIVE
042Providing on-line non-downloadable clinical decision support software; hosting at a central website for use by health professionals clinical decision support computer software applications that evaluate clinical data through the use of algorithms to provide patient treatment recommendations at such central website; all the foregoing provided in the fields of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine and healthACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 4, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 2, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance