Drawing for ULORIC

USPTO serial 77671366

ULORIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULORIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa V. Mueller

Lisa V. Mueller Polsinelli Shughart PC100 S. Fourth St.Suite 1100St. Louis, MO 63102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, xanthine oxidase inhibitorsACTIVEFeb 26, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 14, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 11, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Apr 2, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Apr 2, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 8, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 8, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 16, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 6, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 6, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 20, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance