USPTO serial 77671618
THINK IT ... DONE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINK IT ... DONE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southborough, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gwenn Roos
GWENN ROOS LAW OFFICE OF GWENN ROOS26 BROOKDALE AVEWELLESLEY, MA 02482-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Back-up services for computer hard drive data; Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer diagnostic services; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer hardware and software consulting services; Computer security consultancy; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of information and data; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks; Computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, hosting of inspection, testing, and quality control services' digital content of others; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, providing a web-based system and online portal for customers to remotely manage, administer, modify and control their end user computer devices, data and software applications; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of computer applications for others; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software installation and maintenance; Computer systems analysis; Computer systems integration services; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Computer virus protection services; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Data warehousing; Debugging computer software for others; Developing and updating computer software; Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Document data transfer from one computer format to another; E-mail system design and implementation for others; Hosting of digital content on the Internet; Hosting of web sites; Hosting the web sites of others; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Installation and maintenance of computer software; Installation of computer software; Installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Installation, repair and maintenance of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; IT consulting services; IT integration services; Maintenance and updating of computer software; Maintenance and upgrading of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Maintenance of software for Internet access; Periodic upgrading of computer software for others; Providing an online website for creating and hosting micro websites for businesses; Recovery of computer data; Remote computer backup services; Remote computer network technical monitoring and software maintenance services; Remote online backup of computer data; Repair of computer software; Repair of damaged computer programs; Repair of software; Technical consulting and assistance with computer-based information systems and components; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; Technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Technology advice provided to Internet users by means of a support hotline; Up-dating of computer software; Updating and design of computer software; Updating and maintenance of computer software; Updating of computer programs for third parties; Updating of computer software for others; Web site hosting services | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |