Drawing for A CLEANER CLEAN

USPTO serial 77672185

A CLEANER CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COOPER, CHRISTINE H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A CLEANER CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen E. Treiber

KATHLEEN E. TREIBER COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP101 CALIFORNIA ST FL 5SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning preparations for household purposes; cleaning preparations for institutional purposes; household cleaning products, namely, toilet bowl cleaners not containing disinfectant or antibacterial properties, dish soaps, laundry detergents, fabric softeners for laundry use, anti-static dryer sheets; all purpose cleaning sprays; biodegradable disposable cloths and biodegradable disposable wipes impregnated with non-toxic chemicals or compounds for cleaning, dusting and polishing; cleaning and polishing preparations for household surfaces and furniture; cleaning preparations for specialty surfaces, namely, glass, wood, stainless steel, granite and leather; personal care products, namely, non-medicated hand washes, soaps for personal hygiene, body lotion, non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions, bubble bath and baby shampooACTIVE
005Hand sanitizersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 15, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 15, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance