Drawing for PLANTTRUST

USPTO serial 77672186

PLANTTRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLANTTRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan E. Hollander, Esq.

SUSAN E HOLLANDER MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP1001 PAGE MILL RD.BUILDING 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1008

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, preparations for the treatment of plants; preparations for fortifying plants; plant growth regulant agents; plant nutrient compositions; fertilizers; preparations to expand root structure, increase nutrient uptake, and improve plant health and yield; soil conditioners and amendments; plant growth media containing pesticides, insecticides, fungicides, or herbicides; biological and bacterial preparations and compositions for aiding or enhancing the growth of turf, plants, shrubs, or treesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 9, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 9, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 22, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Sep 27, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 2, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Sep 2, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Sep 2, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jul 20, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 20, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 20, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 21, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 21, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 21, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance