USPTO serial 77672186
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Hollander, Esq.
SUSAN E HOLLANDER MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP1001 PAGE MILL RD.BUILDING 2PALO ALTO, CA 94304-1008| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, preparations for the treatment of plants; preparations for fortifying plants; plant growth regulant agents; plant nutrient compositions; fertilizers; preparations to expand root structure, increase nutrient uptake, and improve plant health and yield; soil conditioners and amendments; plant growth media containing pesticides, insecticides, fungicides, or herbicides; biological and bacterial preparations and compositions for aiding or enhancing the growth of turf, plants, shrubs, or trees | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |