USPTO serial 77672650
DENTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Van Cleve
ROBERT B. VAN CLEVE HILLIS CLARK MARTIN & PETERSON1221 2ND AVE STE 500SEATTLE, WA 98101-2925UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use as a comparative benchmarking and reporting tool and accompanying downloadable electronic manuals for use by dental providers, payers, employers, researchers and vendors for oral and dental health care | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Informational sheets about healthcare data and trends; printed reports featuring healthcare data and trends; printed visuals in the nature of information graphics, charts and tabular reports featuring healthcare data and trends; research reports featuring healthcare data and trends | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing dental providers, payers, employers, researchers and vendors with information for business purposes, namely, information about clinical outcomes, dental patients and procedures, patient satisfaction, and provider financial operational performance; statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposes, namely, providing compilation and analysis of statistical data regarding dental health care outcomes; customer service management for others consisting of analysis and research services regarding patient and provider outcomes, quality, demographics and patient satisfaction in the fields of oral and dental health | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing medical and scientific analysis and research services regarding patient and provider outcomes, health information, quality, demographics and patient satisfaction in the fields of oral and dental health | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing health information, namely, health care research and analysis in the field of oral and dental health | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Compiling and analyzing statistical health data regarding dental health care outcomes in order to uncover and identify health care fraud and claims errors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCS-Dental Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by OCS-Dental Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DENTRA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |