Drawing for PRIMARY PLUS

USPTO serial 77673575

PRIMARY PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMARY PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth T. Veirs

Kenneth T. Veirs Humana Inc.500 West Main Street, 21st FloorLouisville, KY 40202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Administration of managed dental and vision care subscription plans; dental and vision health insurance services in the nature of dental and vision benefits; dental and vision health insurance services in the nature of pre-paid dental and vision benefits; administering discount fee-for-service dental plans, pre-paid dental plans, PPO dental plans and indemnity dental plans; administering discount fee-for-service vision plans, pre-paid vision plans, PPO vision plans and indemnity vision plans; administration of preferred provider programs in the field of dental and vision care; administering and organizing pre-paid dental and vision health plans for employers, PPOs HMOs and group plans for corporations provided through a comprehensive management systemABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2012MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2012ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 19, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 19, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 22, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 5, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 5, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 1, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance