USPTO serial 77673728
D/R DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D/R DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lyle E. Greenman
LYLE E. GREENMAN LYLE E. GREENMAN, ESQ.126 OAKDALE RDNEWTON, MA 02461-1813UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Blank journal books; Book covers; Book markers; Book-cover paper; Bookmarkers; Books in the field of design; Business cards; Calendars; Graphic art reproductions; Greeting cards; Greetings cards and postcards; Note paper; Notebooks; Paper stationery; Postcards and greeting cards; Printed calendars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Design Research, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Design Research, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named D/R DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH DESIGN RESEARCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |