USPTO serial 77674158
THE STRESS MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE STRESS MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minnetonka, MN
Minnetonka, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Damon L. Ward
Damon L. Ward Ward Law Group301 Fourth Avenue SouthSuite 378NMinneapolis, MN 55415Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTERS FEATURING GUIDANCE AND INSTRUCTION IN STRESS REDUCTION TECHNIQUES AND IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, WORKBOOKS, INSTRUCTION BOOKS AND NEWSLETTERS, ALL FEATURING GUIDANCE AND INSTRUCTION IN STRESS REDUCTION TECHNIQUES AND IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PERSONAL COACHING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WELLNESS AND STRESS REDUCTION; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF WELLNESS AND STRESS REDUCTION AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS AND UPDATABLE DOCUMENTATION FOR USE IN IDENTIFYING, CATEGORIZING, ORGANIZING AND MANAGING STRESSORS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; ON-LINE JOURNALS, namely, BLOGS FEATURING DISCUSSIONS IN THE FIELD OF WELLNESS AND STRESS REDUCTION; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC ONLINE NEWSLETTERS FEATURING GUIDANCE AND INSTRUCTION IN STRESS REDUCTION TECHNIQUES AND IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTERS FEATURING GUIDANCE AND INSTRUCTION IN STRESS REDUCTION TECHNIQUES AND IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES VIA EMAIL | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING INDIVIDUALS, GROUPS, ORGANIZATIONS, COMPANIES AND EMPLOYEES TO IDENTIFY, CATEGORIZE AND ORGANIZE ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF STRESS REDUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WELLNESS AND STRESS REDUCTION, NAMELY, PROVIDING PERSONAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES AND COUNSELING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucas, Eric G.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucas, Eric G.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named THE STRESS MAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2012 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |