USPTO serial 77674300
GREENSEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4340113Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 21, 2013
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREENSEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Waterproofing and crack prevention membrane in liquid chemical form, for use in the installation of ceramic tile and stone, sold exclusively to ceramic tile and stone distributors and dealers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 6, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 23, 2020 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 21, 2020 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 6, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 25, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |