Drawing for ALLEGIANCE

USPTO serial 77674477

ALLEGIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLEGIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Christopher Norton, Esq.

N. Christopher Norton, Esq. Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Ave., NWWashington, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Medicated soap; skin soap; liquid soap for hand, face and body; deodorant soap; disinfectant body soap; and disinfectant skin soaps; hair shampoo; cleaning preparations for cleaning the following: hands and body, glassware, metals, ceramics, dried blood, plasma, mucus and other body soils from surgical instruments, laboratory glassware, syringes, needles and other instrumentation, lenses, mirrors and reflectorsACTIVE
005Medicated shampooACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 1, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2009CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Mar 25, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 24, 2009GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2009GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Mar 24, 2009CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 23, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance