Drawing for CAKE CRAZE

USPTO serial 77674866

CAKE CRAZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAKE CRAZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Hostetler

Angela M. Hattan, Legal Assistant Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.800 Market StreetSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CakesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 27, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 26, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 12, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance