CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GREENOPS

USPTO serial 77675405

GREENOPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENOPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gwynne B. Barrett

Gwynne B. Barrett Maldjian Law Group LLC36 Bingam AvenueRumson, NJ 07760UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Recycling and waste treatment services for non-paper product packaging, namely, bottles, cans and containers, and featuring a consumer reward programACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 10, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 24, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 21, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 21, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance