USPTO serial 77675635
THE ORIGINAL KINESIOLOGY TAPE FROM JAPAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 17, 2010
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL KINESIOLOGY TAPE FROM JAPAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SCARBOROUGH ONTARIO, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Intravia
Catherine Intravia Shipman & Goodwin LLPOne Constitution PlazaHartford, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Adhesive tapes for therapeutic purposes for body application | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPIDERTECH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NUCAP MEDICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NUCAP MEDICAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named THE ORIGINAL KINESIOLOGY TAPE FROM JAPAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Aug 17, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | โ |
| Jul 18, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 18, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Oct 18, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 24, 2016 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | โ |
| Jun 23, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jun 10, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 10, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 3, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 17, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Jul 15, 2010 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Jul 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jul 14, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Jul 13, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 9, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jul 9, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | โ |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | โ |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | โ |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | โ |
| May 25, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| May 25, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| May 25, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| May 25, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| May 18, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | โ |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Oct 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| May 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |