USPTO serial 77675772
ALBERT BARTLETT ROOSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2013
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALBERT BARTLETT ROOSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Lanarkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Lanarkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Lanarkshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esquire
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esquire Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed potatoes; french fried potatoes; [ potato chips; ] potato flakes; [ preparations with a potato base, namely, potato pancakes; potato based snack meals and mixes consisting wholly or principally of potatoes and potato salads consisting wholly or principally of potatoes; fried potato products, namely, potato chips, potato crisps and french fried potatoes; ] frozen potato products, namely, [ frozen hash brown potatoes, potato waffles, frozen mashed potato, ] frozen french fried potatoes, frozen roast potatoes, frozen whole or segmented potatoes, [ potatoes in the shape of visages and images, letters numbers and other similar characters, and other preformed potato shapes for oven baking or frying made from reconstituted potato; hash brown potatoes; instant mashed potatoes; instant potatoes; potato based snack food; potato cakes; potato croquettes; potato fries; potato fritters; potato granules; potato pancakes; potato sticks; potato chips; ] potato products being dehydrated, instant potatoes; [ potato fritters, potato gnocchi, potato cakes; German potato pancakes, potato dumplings; potato products in extruded form, namely, visages and images, letters numbers and other similar characters, and other preformed potato shapes made wholly or principally of potato; potato products in the form of snack foods, namely, potato chips and potato crisps; potato-based snack foods; potatoes being dried; potatoes being preserved; potatoes being processed; tinned raw potatoes; precooked potatoes; meal accompaniments and prepared meal components made wholly or principally from potatoes, namely, potato dumplings, potato gnocchi, potato pie toppings, potato dauphniose, potato cobbler, potato pancakes, potato cakes; mashed potatoes, potato cakes, potato pastry, prepared ready meals consisting wholly or principally of potatoes, namely, potato hot pots, potato soups, potato based chowder, potato hash, processed potatoes; ] peeled potatoes, [ potato based snack foods, Extruded food products made of potatoes, namely, potato sticks and shaped figures; potato terrines, roast potatoes, sauté potatoes, rissoles, prepared jacket potatoes, prepared potato salads, baked potato skins ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Potato flour; potato products for use in making snack food, namely, potato flour; potato products and snack foods in extruded form made from potato flour, namely, those derived from potato or sweet potato in chip, stick, cracker, breadstick or formed shapes form; potato crackers; preparations with a potato base, namely, potato bread; potato bread; potato pastry; snack foods containing potato flour as principle ingredient, namely, those derived from potato or sweet potato in chip, stick, cracker, breadstick or formed shapes form; Potato flour for food; potato starch for food; potato bread and potato pastry made from potato flour; potato products with potato as the principle ingredient either in fresh or reconstituted form, namely, potato scones, potato muffins, potato bread; potato based blinis ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Raw potatoes, potato seeds, unprocessed potatoes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named ALBERT BARTLETT ROOSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |