USPTO serial 77675815
ESCARAMUZA CHARRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IMAM, AMEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESCARAMUZA CHARRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alimentos Procesados la Perla de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.
Chimalhuacan, Edo., MX
Other trademarks owned by Alimentos Procesados la Perla de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.
Alimentos Procesados la Perla de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.
Chimalhuacan, Edo., MX
Other trademarks owned by Alimentos Procesados la Perla de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert B. Kimball, Jr.
ALBERT B. KIMBALL, JR. BRACEWELL & GIULIANI LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 2300HOUSTON, TX 77002-2849UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, oat meal, wheat flakes and puffed rice; bread, pastry and baked confections, namely, cakes and cookies; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar; condiments, namely, salad dressing, chow chow, chutney, curry and salsas; spices; ice; tortillas, corn chips and corn precooked for pozole, namely, hominy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alimentos Procesados la Perla de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Alimentos Procesados la Perla de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ESCARAMUZA CHARRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |