Drawing for GOURMET MASTER

USPTO serial 77676165

GOURMET MASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GOURMET MASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ketchup; Artichoke sauce; Barbecue sauce; Barbeque sauce; Cheese sauce; Chicken wing sauce; Chili sauce; Chocolate sauce; Condiment, namely, pepper sauce; Dipping sauces; Fish sauce; Fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and applesauce; Hot sauce; Mix for making combined noodle and sauce dish; Noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and processed vegetables combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and topping combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, dehydrated vegetables, and topping combined in unitary packages; Organic curry sauces; Pasta sauce; Picante sauce; Pico de Gallo sauce; Pizza sauce; Ready-made sauces; Salad sauces; Sauce mixes; Sauces; Sauces for barbecued meat; Soy sauce; Spaghetti sauce; Steak sauce; Tartar sauce; Teriyaki sauce; Tomato sauce; Worcestershire sauceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 14, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 6, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance