Drawing for ECOTOONS

USPTO serial 77676263

ECOTOONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOTOONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BHARATI BAKSHANI

BHARATI BAKSHANI Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronics, namely, computer game consoles for use with an external display screen, computer game cartridges, computer game hardware, namely, computer hardware for use with computer games, game controllers for computer games, computer game softwareACTIVE—
016Stickers; sticker albums; stationery; pens; pencils; paper notebooks; comic booksACTIVE—
028Playing cards; action figures; dolls; toys, namely, infant toys; board games; hand held unit for playing electronic games; card gamesACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, internet service provider, telecommunications access servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of animated cartoons; entertainment services, namely, providing an on line computer game; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring short films in the field of animated cartoonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 27, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 27, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 27, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 2, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2009MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Feb 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance