Drawing for BRIDAL & BEYOND

USPTO serial 77676752

BRIDAL & BEYOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRIDAL & BEYOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jack Smugler

JACK SMUGLER SMUGLERS LLP480 LISGAR STOTTAWA, ON, K1R5H3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Fresh flowers. Wedding cakes. Retail and online sales of clothing, footwear, purses, jewelry, and bridal and wedding accessories, namely, invitations, cards, place cards, favour cards, seals, books, CDs, magazines, DVDs, party favours, vases, glassware, photo albums, centrepieces, and decorations and services. Tailoring and alterations. Tuxedo rentals. Cleaning and preservation of wedding gowns. Wedding photography. Custom design of tuxedos and men's suits. Wedding related referral services for, namely, limousines, wedding cakes, flowers, reception halls, officiants, videographers, makeup artists, wedding planners, and DJs. Limousine services. Flower arranging services. Catering services. Disc jockey services, namely, for weddings. Production of wedding videos. Makeup artist and hairdressing services. Wedding planner services. Arranging and conducting, namely, wedding planning seminars, fashion shows, and wedding events. Retail and online sales of honeymoon, bachelorette party and shower accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 14, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 9, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 9, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Feb 27, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance