USPTO serial 77677763
MY LITTLE BREAKFASTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MY LITTLE BREAKFASTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gordonsville, VA
Gordonsville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A. BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.P.O. BOX 320160ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-4160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Food for toddlers, namely, oatmeal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |