USPTO serial 77678548
DOUBLE DUTCH CLUB BY OLIVET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOUBLE DUTCH CLUB BY OLIVET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Fang
MARK FANG MARK FANG, ATTORNEY AT LAW, APC215 E DAILY DR STE 9CAMARILLO, CA 93010-5805UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bathing suits; Bathing trunks; Beach cover-ups; Beach shoes; Brassieres; Coats; Combinations; Ear muffs; Footwear; Hats; Headbands; Hoods; Hosiery; Jackets; Knit shirts; Layettes; Leggings; Neckties; Pajamas; Pants; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Singlets; Skirts; Slippers; Socks; Stockings; Suits; Sweaters; Swimsuits; Tee shirts; Underclothes; Underpants; Underwear; Vests | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |