USPTO serial 77678668
AAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3948299Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2011
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sikorsky Fractional Sales, Inc.
Wappingers Fall, NY
Sikorsky Fractional Sales, Inc.
Wappingers Fall, NY
Sikorsky Fractional Sales, Inc.
Wappingers Fall, NY
WAPPINGERS FALLS, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
Naresh Kilaru Finnegan, Henderson Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment staffing of helicopter pilots; leasing of pilots; business administration and management for helicopter charter companies; accounting services for helicopter charter companies; business consulting services relating to helicopter fractional sales, namely, instructing others how to establish fractional sales arrangements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1989 |
| 036 | Helicopter fractional sales, namely, formation, brokerage and management of ownership or time share interests in helicopters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1989 |
| 037 | Helicopter fueling services; helicopter maintenance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1989 |
| 039 | Helicopter transport services; transportation of passengers by helicopter; helicopter charter services; helicopter hangar rental services; helicopter piloting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 27, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sikorsky Fractional Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sikorsky Fractional Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sikorsky Fractional Sales, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FRACTIONAL SALES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named AAG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 19, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |