Drawing for VERBATIM TECHNIQUES

USPTO serial 77679140

VERBATIM TECHNIQUES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VERBATIM TECHNIQUES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claire Johnson Saenz

CLAIRE JOHNSON SAENZ KRASSENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL C7500 BROOKTREE RDWEXFORD, PA 15090-9254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operation, product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actionsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 5, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 5, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 21, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 23, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 19, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 19, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance