USPTO serial 77680642
ROTH 5-5 CS HOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2010
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROTH 5-5 CS HOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
UNION CITY, CA
Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
Millbrae, CA
Other trademarks owned by Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
Millbrae, CA
Other trademarks owned by Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
Millbrae, CA
Other trademarks owned by Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Daucher
BRIAN M. DAUCHER SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON650 TOWN CENTER DR 4TH FLCOSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Orthodontic appliances | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTH LICENSING LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
- Other trademarks owned by Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
- Other trademarks owned by Roth Trust, a California Trust, Adriane Roth, Trustee
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ROTH 5-5 CS HOOK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2016 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |