Drawing for CLEAN ENERGY FOR DIRTY MINDS

USPTO serial 77680935

CLEAN ENERGY FOR DIRTY MINDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN ENERGY FOR DIRTY MINDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLP575 7TH STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic carbonated and non-carbonated beverages, namely, fruit drinks and energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 20, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 29, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2011CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 18, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 28, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 28, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 2, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance